King Arthur Fact, Semi-legend
or Myth?
Chapter 4
Medieval Europe
In the Middle Ages, we are
told through legends and stories of mixed heritage that Arthur conquered
Medieval Europe. As a result, for the next three hundred years, Arthur
as a King and a hero towers above all other contemporary legends of
this time. The religious connections with the new versions of King Arthur
troubled the church at the time, due to fact that many of the tales
associated with Arthur clearly contained strong Pagan and Celtic symbolism.
It was now
the 'Cistercian Monks' (founded in AD1098, an off shoot of the Benedictine
Order, established on the Celtic foundations of 'Columbanus' : See
Columbanus,
& Mystical-WWW Mystical Time : Dates, 21
November) who, known to be associated with mysticism, attempted
in the re-writing of the Arthurian legend, to remove any Pagan connotations
by connecting Arthur to the philosophy of 'The Order of the Templars',
later known as 'The Knights Templar'. The framework of this militant
wing of the Cistercian Order, recognised by 'Pope Honorius II' in AD1128,
is suggested to have been based to a large degree on the legendary 'Knights
of the Round Table', (See Round
Table). A new vision of Arthur and the Knights now emerged,
firmly associated with the Christian belief in the 'Transubstantiation',
and that the 'preserve of virginity' was an absolute for all concerned,
therefore dismissing some of the associations that had grown to be analogous
with Arthurian legend.
The concept of the 'Round
Table' was not to fully swing into action until AD1155 with the assistance
of the French. In Cistercian writing, this is the first time we see
the 'Holy Grail' (See Grail)
as an embodiment of these two new qualities, the Grail's appearance
before Arthur being as a vision being described later in the French
'Vulgate Cycle' of the thirteenth-century as possessing the power to
fill the room with the scent of fragrant spices and shining with a tremendous
brightness, symbolic of purity, innocence and faith. The Cistercians
re-wrote the adulterous union between 'Guinevere' (See Guinevere)
and 'Sir Lancelot' (See Lancelot)
in an interpretation, which clearly indicates from the start, that the
relationship is doomed when viewed in light of the two central Cistercian
beliefs associated with Arthur, as further extolled by the Order of
Templars, that of valour, honour, integrity and central to their order,
spirituality.
In the thirteenth-century
'Vulgate Cycle', the character of Lancelot is clearly depicted in a
dilemma as a dual character, betraying not only the King but the Divine
Order. Here it is inferred that Lancelot is trapped by the Knights into
a liaison with Guinevere. Their hostility towards Lancelot is rooted
in his unchaste nature and his actions. A once beloved Knight, here
Lancelot is seen to demonstrate the sullying of the body and spirit
by the root of all evil, a pagan influence.
Guinevere and Lancelot are
disturbed at their moment of adulterous union by other loyal Knights
of the Round Table, it is emphasised here before any sexual activity
took place but the deceit is to signal his downfall from grace. Lancelot
escapes from capture and flees. His actions here have been seen to initiate
the beginning of the end of the Round Table. Although the Knights search
for him, he cannot be found and we see Arthur commanding that Guinevere
be taken from him, convinced of her treachery. Lancelot returns to save
her just before she is to be burnt to death. A war then breaks out between
Arthur and Lancelot, which then gives 'Mordred' (now written in the
Vulgate Cycle as Arthur's own son conceived by incest) the chance to
build forces against Arthur in his attempt to usurp him whilst he is
distracted on a noble cause. The 'Battle of Camlan', said to take place
on 'Salisbury Plain', ensues (again an indication of the location of
the Isle of Avalon). Lancelot suddenly appears to defend Arthur, and
Mordred is killed, but in the midst of battle Arthur is mortally wounded.
Arthur is left alone with
Griflet, (See Griflet)
, a Knight of the Round Table. Griflet is ordered to take Excalibur
and cast it into the lake. This is the first time we are introduced
to the idea of the 'Lady of the Lake' (See Lady
of the Lake). Griflet is said to have attempted to cast Excalibur
out into the lake, returning to Arthur saying that he had done so, and
Arthur asking him what he had seen, knowing that a hand would appear
to catch the sword. (Griflet does not state this until the third time).
We learn that Griflet was the last person to be with Arthur as he lay
mortally wounded, who is left to take the body of Arthur to the boat
which will take him to Avalon Here the disappearance of the sword, together
with Arthur travelling to Avalon, was seen to indicate the end of the
story of Arthur, and a lack of clarity as to whether there was clear
possibility of his return.
Now although the Cistercian
monks had attempted to remove the Pagan symbolism from the story of
Arthur, it was still felt, years later, that if the legendary Arthurian
Romances were to be associated with the purity of the Holy Grail, this
connection could be held to be Pagan heresy. The Cistercian's were determined
to fully exorcise any reference to Paganism and so 'The Knights Templar'
were used as the vehicle. In AD1312 the Order of the Knights Templar
was suppressed by Papal decree, and by the Renaissance period, the legends
of Arthur were either looked upon with indifference or to be mocked.
The religious associations
of the town of 'Glastonbury' (See Glastonbury),
'Glastonbury Tor' (See Arthurian
Places) and the 'Chalice Well' (See Arthurian
Places) with Arthurian legend is thought to have begun to gain
pace in the twelfth-century. A monastery had been established in 'Glastonbury',
Somerset (See Glastonbury
Religion) since c.AD673, and now in the twelfth-century, the
'Benedictine Monks' seized on an earlier story, believed to have been
first introduced by the French. It focused on 'Joseph of Arimithea'
(See Joseph
of Arimathea), indicating that he had come to Britain with the
'Golden Chalice', or the 'Holy Grail' (See Grail).
The monks claimed that the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea was within the
grounds of 'Glastonbury Abbey' (See Arthurian
Places). The knowledge that a Christian place of worship had
been established in Glastonbury circa AD636 added weight to the possibility
of such claims being true. The earliest evidenced place of worship is
the 'Old Wattle Church' referred to in the early Celtic Church, associated
with 'Illytd' (See Mystical-WWW Mystical Time : Dates, 6
November) and 'Patrick' (See Mystical-WWW Mystical Time :
Dates, 17
March). The 'Old Wattle Church' (See Glastonbury
Religion) as described in records of the early Celtic Church
is documented in the historical record written by 'William of Malmesbury'
entitled 'On the Antiquity of the Church of Glastonbury', believed to
have been written in AD1124.
The finding of famous historical
figures by the Benedictine monks has been a matter of some dispute,
as it appears they had a reputation for claiming to have found the tombs
of many other people including that of 'Gildas' (See Mystical -WWW
Mystical Time : Dates, 29
January), and even 'Dunstan, the Archbishop of Canterbury' (between
AD959-988). In AD1191 the monks claimed to have found the bodies of
'Arthur' and 'Guinevere' and to have re-buried the couple in the grounds
of the Abbey (See Avalon).
Most historians now feel that this discovery was a monastic hoax, but
why these associations were made as late as the twelfth-century is intriguing.
This feature was brought to you by Mystical World Wide Web, copyright
"http://www.mystical-www.co.uk"
|